“The patch … is used widely in the criminal justice system because of its perceived advantages over other forms of drug testing.”
In Meyer, retired Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court Sandra Day O’Connor, explained, “The sweat patch, which is marketed by PharmChem, Inc., is composed of an absorbent pad and an outer membrane. After the skin is cleaned with alcohol, the patch is applied to the wearer[], and the absorbent pad collects the wearer’s sweat, over a period of a week or more. . . . The [wearer]’s sweat wets the pad, the water in the sweat eventually evaporates through the non-occlusive membrane, and any drugs remain in the absorbent pad. Once the sweat patch is removed from the [wearer], it is returned to PharmChem for analysis.”
Courts across the United States use the PharmChek® sweat patch for pretrial supervision, probation and parole, drug courts, and child protection proceedings.
The National Association of Drug Court Professionals Best Practice Standards recognize “recent studies have begun to examine other testing methods in Drug Courts, including sweat patches…”
Courts regularly rely on the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) clearance of the sweat patch dating to 1990, as an indicator of its reliability.
The sweat patch is generally accepted in the field of toxicology.
In admitting results into evidence, courts regularly cite to the dozens of peer-reviewed academic studies that support its reliability.
Hundreds of courts have ruled the results are reliable and admissible. In an opinion by retired Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court Sandra Day O’Connor, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit recognized, “The patch … is used widely in the criminal justice system because of its perceived advantages over other forms of drug testing, e.g., its non-invasiveness, resistance to intentional adulteration, and ability to detect drug-use over relatively long periods.
In U.S. v. Gatewood, 370 F.3d 1055, 1061 (10th Cir. 2004), vacated on other grounds, 543 U.S. 1109 (2005), the court held sweat patch results are admissible for sentencing purposes because the PharmChem laboratory report had “sufficient indicia of reliability to support its probable accuracy.” In U.S. v. Gragg, 95 F.3d 1154 (7th Cir. 1996), the court affirmed a sentence based on the showing that PharmChem’s results are “accurate and its techniques thorough and proper.”
Tamper evident
Increased window of detection
Acts as a deterrent to drug use
Variable removal date
Cost effective
Reliable
Hygienic alternative to urine testing
7 – 10 days of wear time
Tests for both the drug metabolite and parent drug
Cannot be diluted
Retains drugs used any time during wear period
Continuous monitoring; 24 hours a day, 7 days a week
© 2022, MedWay Onsite Health Solutions, Inc. All Rights Reserved.